A randomized trial published November 10, 2026 in Scientific Reports put 80 recreational runners through calf-damaging eccentric exercise and then split them evenly into four recovery conditions: repeated ice massage, percussive massage with a massage gun, the two combined, or passive rest. Treatments began immediately after exercise and were repeated twice a day, seven sessions over 72 hours. By 72 hours, muscle soreness had fallen 1.2 to 1.35 points further on the rating scale in every treated group than in the rest group, calf and Achilles tendon stiffness measured by shear wave elastography dropped more, and reactive strength recovered better, most of all with the combined treatment (0.24 meters per second more than rest). Lactate dehydrogenase differences were gone by 72 hours. The trial, registered as ISRCTN49499065, reported no funding, ran at a single center, and the authors describe the edge of the combined treatment over either alone as exploratory. Note what it did not test: it compared local cold and percussion with doing nothing, not with heat, and not with cold-water immersion.

Heat, cold or a chair: a four-arm trial

The more direct hot-versus-cold test came in the Journal of Thermal Biology, published online August 20, 2026 and in the October 2026 issue. Forty healthy, physically active adults did a bout of eccentric knee extensions and were randomized, ten per group, to hot-water immersion at 42 degrees Celsius (about 108 Fahrenheit) for 30 minutes, cold-water immersion at 9 degrees Celsius (48 Fahrenheit) for 15 minutes, 30 minutes of hot air at 30 degrees Celsius, or 30 minutes sitting at room temperature. Maximal strength fell about 36 percent in every group right after exercise. At 72 hours it was back to roughly 88 to 89 percent of baseline after heat, hot air or rest and about 82 percent after cold, a gap that was not statistically significant. Soreness rose at 24 hours and was still elevated at 72 in all four groups; no strategy brought it back to baseline. Where the groups did differ was in blood: the muscle-damage marker CK-MM returned to baseline by 48 hours after hot water and by 72 after hot air or rest but was still elevated at 72 hours after cold water, and heat shock protein 72 rose more after the heat conditions. The authors conclude that those molecular differences did not translate into better function, and that repeated heat exposure over longer periods needs study. London South Bank University funded the work; with ten people per arm, it was small.

What the pooled trials say about cold water

A Bayesian network meta-analysis in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, published March 18, 2026, pooled 87 randomized trials (the abstract gives 2,313 participants) of cold-water immersion after resistance training, endurance exercise and team sport, mostly against passive rest. For strength after lifting, no immersion protocol beat sitting still. For power after lifting and after team sport, cold (5 to 8 degrees Celsius) and long (more than 15 minutes) immersion came out ahead, with Hedges g of 0.80 and 1.00 respectively but wide credible intervals and low certainty. Across all modalities, moderate-temperature (9 to 12 degrees) immersion of 10 to 15 minutes was associated with lower muscle-damage markers (g of 0.51) and better perceived recovery (0.66). About 85 percent of participants were male, most comparisons leaned on indirect evidence, and the authors did not evaluate long-term adaptation.

The adaptation question

That last point is the one lifters ask about, and two older meta-analyses address it. Sports Medicine published a systematic review in January 2021 that pooled eight controlled studies of regular cold-water immersion, at 15 degrees Celsius or below, used throughout a training program. When paired with resistance training, immersion was associated with smaller gains in maximal strength and strength endurance (standardized mean difference of 0.60 against training alone) and in ballistic performance (0.61). Paired with endurance training, it made no difference to maximal aerobic power or time-trial performance. The review was funded by the Brazilian agency FAPESP.

The European Journal of Sport Science published a Bayesian meta-analysis on February 5, 2024 of eight randomized studies of at least four weeks, 116 participants in all, that measured muscle growth. Cold-water immersion right after lifting was associated with a small reduction in hypertrophy (comparative standardized mean difference of 0.22, credible interval 0.47 to 0.04 the other way), with a 96 percent probability that the direction favored training alone. Studies were short, mostly in young men, and rated fair to poor in quality. For endurance training, a Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports trial published March 1, 2026 randomized 16 men to five weeks of high-intensity interval training with or without 15 minutes at 11 degrees Celsius after each session and found no difference in VO2 max, time to failure or muscle adaptation markers. It was funded by Brazilian research agencies and is tiny.

So, hot or cold?

Read together: in the one trial that pitted them against a chair, neither hot nor cold water restored strength or soreness faster over three days. Cold water has pooled support for next-day power and for feeling recovered, strongest after high-intensity or team-sport work, and consistent signals that using it after every lifting session trims strength and size gains over weeks. Heat sped the clearance of a damage marker without changing function. Local ice massage and percussion beat rest in runners over 72 hours, in one trial, against nothing. The practical question is what the next session asks of you: a competition tomorrow is a different case from a hypertrophy block. Anyone recovering from an injury rather than a workout is in different territory, where immersion temperatures and durations belong in a conversation with a clinician or physical therapist.

This article reports research and expert guidance. It is not medical advice. Talk to your clinician before changing medication, treatment or a medical diet.

Sources